EMAIL DETAILS

OK- got it. I read the email and it wasn’t clear what the ask was. Let’s
discuss when you get back how best to handle Frank.


Eric D. Schwerin

Rosemont Seneca Partners, LLC

1010 Wisconsin Ave., NW

Suite 705

Washington, DC 20007

(202) 333-1880

[email protected] <[email protected]>

*P** **Consider the environment before printing this email.***


*From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
*Sent:* Thursday, March 04, 2010 1:48 PM
*To:* Eric Schwerin
*Subject:* Re: Washinton Mutual Issue


Read the email I sent you from Nick. Boies represents creditors in this
instance and wants tax credits to go to receivership not JP Morgan.

Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®
------------------------------

*From: *Eric Schwerin <[email protected]>

*Date: *Thu, 4 Mar 2010 13:26:31 -0500

*To: *[email protected]<[email protected]>

*Subject: *Re: Washinton Mutual Issue


If Lawranne is still there I could probably call her. Who's the client?
JPM?

Eric D. Schwerin

[email protected]


Sent from my iPhone


On Mar 4, 2010, at 1:18 PM, "[email protected]" <
[email protected]> wrote:

Can we get David Boies a meeting with Frank's staff on WaMu issue.

Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®
------------------------------

*From: *Nicholas Gravante <[email protected]>

*Date: *Thu, 4 Mar 2010 13:19:12 -0500

*To: *'[email protected]'<[email protected]>

*Cc: *Michael Endler<[email protected]>

*Subject: *Re: Washinton Mutual Issue


Hunter,

FYI, David is meeting with Sheila Bair on Monday in DC. Let me know if you
have any luck with Frank or his staff.

Regards,
Nick


------------------------------

*From*: Nicholas Gravante
*To*: [email protected] <[email protected]>
*Cc*: Michael Endler
*Sent*: Wed Mar 03 11:21:46 2010
*Subject*: FW: Washinton Mutual Issue


Hunter,


The email below is the general introduction email we have used when
contacting folks an Capitol Hill. Please let me know if you need anything
else.


Thanks,

Nick


Here is text for an all purposes email


You may remember that in September of 2008, JP Morgan bought most of the
assets of Washington Mutual Bank for $1.88 billion from the FDIC. This
transaction occurred on the same day WaMu was closed and the FDIC was
appointed WaMu’s receiver. JPM has reported that it has made billions from
its 2008 purchase of WaMu from the FDIC. JPMC a TARP recipient, is now
claiming an additional $2.6 billion in WaMu tax refunds *from the November
2009 stimulus package*. Congress expressly carved out TARP recipients—such
as JPM—from those who could benefit from the November 2009 stimulus package.
JPM argues nonetheless that there is a* *loophole in the
law*:*Washington Mutual Bank, not JPMC, may claim the stimulus tax
relief and then
turn it over to JPM. JPM is now trying to obtain the FDIC’s consent to a
settlement of claims that awards the $2.6 billion in stimulus refunds to a
TARP recipient (JPM) and the FDIC is urging a settlement that will permit
that result.


------------------------------

IRS Circular 230 disclosure:
To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, unless we
expressly state otherwise, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice
contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended
or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding
penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or
recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
------------------------------

The information contained in this electronic message is confidential
information intended only for the use of the named recipient(s) and may
contain information that, among other protections, is the subject of
attorney-client privilege, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure
under applicable law. If the reader of this electronic message is not the
named recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the
named recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution, copying or other use of this communication is strictly
prohibited and no privilege is waived. If you have received this
communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to
this electronic message and then deleting this electronic message from your
computer. [v.1