EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
Re: conference call tonight?
PRI: NORMAL
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
CC:
H
Hunter Biden
<[email protected]>
S
Alexander Snyder-Mackler
<[email protected]>
T
ted kaufman
<[email protected]>
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
Agree that is the message. I think it makes sense for him to do it. Sent from my iPhone On Jan 20, 2010, at 11:08 AM, [email protected] wrote: > Charlie Oberly called re press request he hot from NBC Phila re > Coakley effect on my decision. Did you all see his comments in NJ. > Told him they were ok but really the point I would like him to make > is that Coakley, Castle, opponents, other elections are not a > consideration for me -- it is a personal decision that Beau will > make. "Not a factor for Beau one way or other. One thing I know he > is focussed on is Bradley case." Told him Bradley not Coakley. > all that said, should he even call them back and/or do on camera > interview. > > On Jan 20, 2010, at 10:12 AM, Acdonilon wrote: > >> Ok >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Jan 20, 2010, at 10:05 AM, Alexander Snyder-Mackler <[email protected] >> > wrote: >> >>> Can everyone do a conference call tonight after Beau's kids are in >>> bed to go over tomorrow (especially statement/QnA) one last time? >>> I would guess around 830ish? >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 9:58 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Yes >>> From: Alexander Snyder-Mackler <[email protected]> >>> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:52:23 -0500 >>> To: BB<[email protected]> >>> Subject: conf call >>> >>> do you want to do a conference call with Mike/Ted/Hunter after the >>> kids are in bed tonight? >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Alexander Snyder-Mackler >>> (302) 598-8678 >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Alexander Snyder-Mackler >>> (302) 598-8678 > >
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
AdhhpahKL25si260Q2mVJAu0UxLPcQ==
REFERENCES:
REPLY_TO: