EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
FW: Opportunity to comment on CGC tax policy paper and Volcker Board presentation notes
PRI: NORMAL
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
E
'Eric Schwerin'
<[email protected]>
M
'Mike Muldoon'
<[email protected]>
CC:
H
'Hunter Biden'
<[email protected]>
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
Hi guys, This came through from Reed's group. We have the opportunity to provide feedback or advice. Let me know if you want to discuss and if we want to send back any consolidated comments. We own any comment end of day today - sorry for not getting this out to you sooner. Best, Neil ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- Neil Callahan Rosemont Seneca 401 Greenwich Street, Suite 400 | New York NY 10013 | 212-933-9965 1010 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 705 | Washington DC 20007 | 202-333-1880 917-945-9516 (mobile) 866-749-8879 (fax) From: Alexander Kragie [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 10:30 AM To: Alexander Kragie Subject: Opportunity to comment on CGC tax policy paper and Volcker Board presentation notes Good morning Supporting Participants of the Coalition for Green Capital (and Potential Supporting Participants): As a follow-up to Reed Hundt's testimony to House Ways and Means last Friday, we are working on a tax policy paper to present to Ways & Means and the President's Economic Recovery Advisory Board. In addition, you can find attached the notes from the CGC's presentation to the President's Economic Recovery Advisory Board (PERAB), also known as the Volcker Board. Below and attached is a suggested outline of the paper. Please contact Genevieve Nowicki [email protected] by COB this Friday if you: (1) Have any additional items that you believe should be included and/or (2) You wish to help write and/or review one of the below sections. Thank you, Alex I. Lowering the cost of capital by expanding states existing bonding authority a. H.R.3525: Provide Tax Exempt Bond Financing for Clean Energy Projects i. Current law provides tax-exempt bond financing for certain publicly beneficial private activities ranging from airport facilities to solid waste facilities, and including the financing of garbage trucks and collection bins. This proposal would expand that law to include tax exempt bond financing for renewable energy, energy efficiency, demand side management, energy storage, electric transmission, smart grid, zero emission vehicles, water efficiency and water conservation projects. ii. More specifically, the proposal would amend the Internal Revenue Code to: 1. Add additional categories of tax exempt private activity bonds for renewable energy, energy efficiency, demand side management, energy storage, electric transmission, smart grid, zero emission vehicles, water efficiency and water conservation projects; 2. Allow private companies to utilize both tax exempt bonds and federal tax credits for new categories; and, 3. Exclude these new categories of tax-exempt bonds from the statewide volume cap (just like other tax exempt bonds for airports, non-profits, schools and hospitals). 4. Add at the end of Section 168(g)(5)(C) "or any property that is part of a clean energy project within the meaning of Section 142(a)". b. HR 4967 (Renewable Energy Schools Act): allows entities with bonding authority to enter into PPAs in order to capture the ITC, and use their bonding authority to pay for renewable installations without running afoul of anti-arbitrage tax provisions i. In order for schools and local governments to use tax-exempt bonds on a renewable energy system the local government needs to own the system to get the bonds, except for utilities (POUs). POUs are allowed to do pre-paid service agreements with their tax exempt bonding authority. ii. This legislation would allow local government and schools to both get the low interest financing and take advantage of the ITC. c. Restore the deduction for bonds issued for renewable projects i. Amend Section 265(b)(3)(B)(i) of the Code to provide that tax exempt bonds described in Section 142(a) of the Code that are issued to finance a clean energy project are "qualified tax-exempt obligations". II. Changes to current tax provisions, revenue neutral provisions??? a. Change the law to allow Master Limited Partnerships to be also used for renewable energy projects. i. Currently they are limited to midstream oil/gas and other not generating/producing infrastructure. ii. Provide that items of deduction and credit arising from ownership of an interest in a renewable energy master limited partnership will not be limited by the provisions of b. S. 3137 SUN act: allows individuals to capture tax credit for Solar purchases that are not on their property (they can buy into community solar projects) this allows renters and those with unsuitable sites/rooftops to invest in solar c. Levelize all administrative and recapture provisions of grant-in lieu of the tax credit and investment tax credit (ITC). i. Sec 1603, Grants-in lieu of energy tax credits have been promulgated with regulations that define recapture more clearly and flexibly than ITC recapture rules, removing risk of recapture to investors, for example if a project changes ownership during the five-year compliance period, to a different US Taxpayer. These same regulations should be applied to ITCs, to reduce recapture risk for those who select ITCs over Grants. This will reduce inter-creditor friction and transaction cost and time to complete renewable energy financing d. Fixes the tax-exempt investor ban for ITC and grant in lieu of tax credit i. . One instance in which ITC rules are more rational than Grant guidance concerns non-qualified owners and investors, who may not invest to any extent at all in projects that seek Sec 1603 Grants. There, the ITC principal that the fraction of non-qualified ownership should be removed from ITCs should also apply to Grants-in-lieu. e. Continues most of the beneficial rules currently provided in Treasury guidance (e.g., liberal recapture provisions; ability to use "blockers" with respect to tax-exempt owners; ability to use sale-leasebacks with tax-exempt lessees; and, in the case of partnerships, payments will be made to the entity, rather than the partners.) III. Energy Efficiency Provisions a. HR 4226 (Rep. Reichert), Expanding Building Efficiency Incentives Act of 2009 (increases the Energy Efficient Commercial Building Tax Deduction from $1.80 per square foot to $3.00 per square foot for energy efficient building systems in new or existing buildings). b. HR 2198 (Rep. Bean), To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a shorter recovery period for the depreciation of certain systems installed in nonresidential real property or residential rental property (provides accelerated depreciation for energy-efficient HVAC systems). c. HR 4296 (Rep. Halvorson), Mechanical Insulation Installation Incentive Act of 2009 (provides a tax deduction for installing and maintaining mechanical insulation). d. HR 4455 (Rep. Thompson), Expanding Industrial Energy Efficiency Incentives Act of 2009 (benefits advanced motors and combined heat and power systems IV. Extending Previous Tax provisions a. Extend the Renewable energy grants (grants in lieu of ITC) in ARRA <http://www.dsireusa.org/incentives/incentive.cfm?Incentive_Code=US53F&> http://www.dsireusa.org/incentives/incentive.cfm?Incentive_Code=US53F& b. Renew the ARRA bonus depreciation for qualifying renewable energy property <http://www.dsireusa.org/incentives/incentive.cfm?Incentive_Code=US06F> http://www.dsireusa.org/incentives/incentive.cfm?Incentive_Code=US06F c. Expand Section 48C V. Low Income programs a. LIHEAP fuels switching tax credit: i. Add a program to convert oil furnaces for participants in low income heating assistance program through tax credits. The subsidizing oil heating has been tens of billions annually for a generation since the oil shocks of the seventies. Switching to gas or preferably ground source heat pump, heat pump and wood could potentially be scored as a savings in the ten-year budget window. b. Section 8 housing energy efficiency tax credit i. Create a tax credit for foreclosed houses/properties to be bought and energy updated as part of an energy efficiency low-income housing program. Model leases where energy usage incentives are split between landlord and tenant, sub metering at the residence level, energy star or equivalent measures of efficiency compliance. -- Alexander Kragie 202.579.2354 [email protected]
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
AcriKEux6N+aM1SqTOqZsEvRXcTipwA5Pgyg