EMAIL DETAILS

Agreed. Once I have the concept draft outlining the opportunity (tomorrow AM), I will attach this page of "considerations" for us to discuss. I still don't fully understand why we'd do this, but need to see it fully laid out.


Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Schwerin <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:32:27
To: Neil Callahan<[email protected]>
Cc: Hunter Biden<[email protected]>; Devon Archer<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Our FOFs pro-forma

Neil-

Per our conversation today, it would be helpful to evaluate this FOFs
on a variety of levels.

1) Do we agree that we should take no management fee/performance fee?
2) Do we think the money could be raised if we did take either fees?
3) If we think the money can be raised, how much time would be
required from the principals to do so? Arlene believes she can raise
all of the money if we had no fees. But is it worth others' time to
try and raise money if we were to charge a fee?
4) What is the purpose of this if we are getting no income from it?
5) Do we develop a model where the first $50m is fee-free, but
anything after that involves a fee? How much would we make from this
and at what point would we have the ability to jettison our Fund
clients?
6) What would having the FOF be "woman-owned" by Arlene mean?
7) Would we charge fees for legal and regulatory work at least? It
shouldn't cost us anything, right?

Just some questions how I am framing this.

Eric


Eric D. Schwerin
Rosemont Seneca Partners, LLC
1010 Wisconsin Ave., NW
Suite 705
Washington, DC 20007
(202) 333-1880
[email protected]
P Consider the environment before printing this email.