EMAIL DETAILS
SUBJECT:
FW: Office of Vice President Biden Intelligence Briefing for Thursday, March 7, 2019
PRI: NORMAL
FROM:
K
kchung@vpbiden.org
DATE:
2019-03-07 13:46:59
MSG_ID:
<5440fffd1ed14b9045c559c2d0a2fcd9@mail.gmail.com>
RECIPIENTS:
TO:
H
Valerie Biden Owens
<hurricane5155@gmail.com>
J
Jimmy Biden
<jbiden@lionhallgp.com>
J
Jill Tracy Biden
<jill.tracy2@gmail.com>
R
Hunter Biden
<rhbdc@icloud.com>
T
Ashley Blazer Biden
<trailblazerbiden@gmail.com>
CONTENT:
TEXT: YES |
HTML: YES
PROCESSED
Office of Vice President Biden Intelligence Briefing *From:* Bulletin Intelligence <Biden@BulletinIntelligence.com> *Sent:* Thursday, March 7, 2019 7:58 AM *To:* Biden@BulletinIntelligence.com *Subject:* Office of Vice President Biden Intelligence Briefing for Thursday, March 7, 2019 *Click to access <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=000-966&t=c> mobile-optimized online version, including download options and an audio reader.* [image: Image removed by sender. Office of Vice President Biden Intelligence Briefing] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=001-95f&t=c> *To: Vice President Joe Biden* *Thursday, March 7, 2019 8:00 AM EST* Today's Table of Contents *Biden in the News* <#SECTION_1> • Gallup: 56% Of Americans View Biden Favorably. <#S1> • CNN’s 2020 Democratic Rankings: 1) Harris; 2) Biden; 3) Sanders. <#S2> • CNBC: Trump Asked His Advisors If He Should Be Concerned About Facing Biden. <#S3> • NYTimes: With Pieces In Place For A 2020 Run, All That Awaits Is Biden’s Decision. <#S4> • Key Latino Operative Signs On With Biden Ahead Of Expected 2020 Bid. <#S5> • Media Analyses: Bloomberg Exit Likely Presages Bid By Wall Street-Favored Biden. <#S6> • Firefighters Union Chief Schaitberger Wants Biden To Run. <#S7> • Opinion Pieces Focus On Possible Biden Run. <#S8> • GOP Strategist: Democratic Party “Has Moved On” From Biden. <#S9> • HuffPost Analysis: Biden Calls Himself “Middle-Class Joe,” But Few Others Do. <#S10> • Writer: Biden’s “Decent Guy” Remark On Pence Shows He’s “Out Of Touch.” <#S11> • Breitbart: CNN Panel Of “Democratic Voters” Included Ex-Congressional Candidate, Activists. <#S12> • Wilmington News Journal Highlights Biden’s Stances On Key Issues. <#S13> • Democrats Prioritize “Electability,” But Not Necessarily Moderation, In Picking A Nominee. <#S14> • In New Hampshire, Some 2016 Supporters Of Sanders Slow To Embrace His 2020 Run. <#S15> • WPost A1: Harris’ Term As San Francisco DA Was Marred By Crime Lab Scandal. <#S16> • Hickenlooper’s Campaign Says He Raised Over $1M In Less Than 48 Hours. <#S17> • DNC Will Exclude Fox From Televising 2020 Primary Debates. <#S18> *Leading the News* <#SECTION_2> • Trump Urges GOP To “Stay United” On Border Policy As Senate Vote Nears. <#S19> *Foreign Policy* <#SECTION_3> • Trump “Very Disappointed” If North Korea Is Rebuilding Missile Site. <#S20> • WPost Analysis: National Security Team Struggles To Explain Trump Foreign Policy. <#S21> • Pence Announces Additional Visa Revocations Targeting Maduro Allies. <#S22> • Report: “Hundreds” Of ISIS Fighters Surrender, “Hundreds” More Captured Trying To Flee. <#S23> • Rouhani: No Chance Of Negotiations With US. <#S24> • Erdoğan: Turkey Will Not Go Back On Missile Defense Deal With Russia. <#S25> • Former Trudeau Aide Defends PM In SNC-Lavalin Scandal. <#S26> *Domestic Policy* <#SECTION_4> • Media Analyses: Record Trade Deficit Evidence Of Trump Policy Failures. <#S27> • Bloomberg Analysis: Trump Wants China Deal To Boost Stocks And Reelection Campaign. <#S28> • Lawyers Tied To Giuliani Contacted Cohen After FBI Raids. <#S29> • House Democrats: Administration Has Refused Or Delayed Providing Documents In 30 Investigations. <#S30> • Democrats “Outraged” Over Trump Action On Ivanka’s Security Clearance. <#S31> • AP Analysis: Liu Nomination For DOJ Post Could Have Impact On Mueller Prosecutions. <#S32> • White House Pressuring Automakers To Side With Administration Lawsuit Over California Regulations. <#S33> *Cancer Research* <#SECTION_5> • Long Island Cancer Facility Set To Open In April. <#S34> • University Of Rochester Cancer Center Receives $3.4M NCI Grant. <#S35> *Editorials/Op-Eds* <#SECTION_6> • New York Times. <#S36> • Washington Post. <#S37> Biden in the News Gallup: 56% Of Americans View Biden Favorably. Gallup <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=002-395&t=c> (3/7, Jones) reports that as former Vice President Joe Biden mulls a 2020 White House run, “recent Gallup polling indicates that he would be a formidable candidate, given Americans’ positive image of him. Currently, 56% of Americans have a favorable opinion about Biden,” according to “a Feb. 12-28 Gallup poll.” While “that is down slightly from the prior reading in January 2017 near the end of his vice presidency, it still ranks among the best Gallup has measured for him to date.” Gallup adds that Biden’s popularity peaked “at 61% during his final days” as vice president, and he “has retained most of that increase over the past two years. Eight in 10 Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents have a favorable opinion of Biden.” CNN’s 2020 Democratic Rankings: 1) Harris; 2) Biden; 3) Sanders. In an online article for CNN <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=003-761&t=c> (3/7), Chris Cillizza and Harry Enten offer their updated “rankings of the 10 candidates most likely to wind up as the Democratic presidential nominee against Donald Trump in November 2020.” Topping the list is Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA), followed by former Vice President Joe Biden, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), and ex-Rep. Beto O’Rourke (D-TX). Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) rounds out the top five. Of Biden, the writers say that while he “continues to lead national polling and has strength in all the early states,” he also “has weaknesses. He has a long record that can easily be attacked. Democratic voters are not enthusiastic about nominating someone over the age of 75. He could also be stale from not having run a campaign for a long time. We wonder how much of his polling advantage will evaporate once he is no longer just President Barack Obama’s vice president and he is his own entity.” CNBC: Trump Asked His Advisors If He Should Be Concerned About Facing Biden. In an online report, CNBC <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=004-9be&t=c> (3/6, Schwartz) said that President Trump on Monday met privately “with close advisors at the White House to discuss a wide range of topics, including the 2020 presidential election – and concerns about possibly facing former Vice President Joe Biden.” During the session, Trump “asked whether he should be concerned about Biden” winning “the Democratic nomination, according to” sources. CNBC said, “The advisors told Trump that they’re not convinced Biden would appeal to the Democratic Party’s left wing or make it through a primary,” and that “they believe Biden’s opponents will say he’s out of touch with the base of his own party.” CNBC added, “When asked why the president spoke about Biden, one” source said “that the former vice president ‘is the least crazy out of all’ the potential Democratic 2020 candidates.” NYTimes: With Pieces In Place For A 2020 Run, All That Awaits Is Biden’s Decision. The New York Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=005-064&t=c> (3/7, Martin, Burns) reports, “The pieces for a” White House run by former Vice President Joe Biden “are falling into place: His nucleus of advisers has begun offering campaign positions to seasoned Democratic strategists. They are eyeing a headquarters in Delaware or nearby Philadelphia and a launch date in the beginning of April. Mr. Biden’s family is on board – his wife, Jill, enthusiastically so.” However, “there is still one crucial element that’s outstanding: full and final consent from” Biden. The Times adds, “This juxtaposition – an eager cadre of supporters laying the groundwork for a campaign they assure is all but certain while the would-be candidate publicly vacillates – has effectively kept the nascent Democratic race on hold.” Key Latino Operative Signs On With Biden Ahead Of Expected 2020 Bid. Politico <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=006-33f&t=c> (3/6, Thompson) reported, “In the latest sign that” former Vice President will mount a 2020 White House bid, “his team has brought on Cristóbal Alex, the head of the influential Latino Victory Fund, according to a source.” It remains unclear “what role Alex would fill in a Biden presidential campaign. He served as Hillary Clinton’s National Deputy Director of Voter Outreach and Mobilization in 2016.” Alex on Tuesday “tweeted that he believes ‘Donald Trump is a clear and present danger to our nation. I am committed to doing everything in my power to defeat him, and my next steps will reflect that.’” The Washington Examiner <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=007-321&t=c> (3/6, Simonson) reported that DNC chief Tom Perez lauded “Alex in a tweet shortly after the news was announced. ‘@CristobalJAlex created an incredible legacy with @latinovictoryus, and it is because of his work and leadership that we now have more Latinx people in office all across this country.’” The Hill <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=008-797&t=c> (3/6, Rodrigo) reported hat Alex “has previously appeared at events with Biden in Nevada and Florida.” In an online article, Fox News <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=009-f91&t=c> (3/6, Llorente) reported that Alex recently “defended Biden on Twitter after the former vice president came under fire from the LGBT community for referring to Vice President Mike Pence – who has controversial views on LGBT issues – as ‘a decent guy’ in a speech. ‘For those attacking @JoeBiden today, it’s worth remembering the VP took enormous heat for announcing his support for gay marriage on @MeetThePress long before others, as senator he blocked ultra-conservative Judge Bork & he’s officiated gay marriages. He’s always been an ally.’” Breitbart <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=00a-81a&t=c> (3/6, Caplan) reported, “The Latino Victory Fund, a political action committee that works to elect progressive Hispanic candidates, met with blowback last year for releasing an ad depicting a supporter of then-Republican Virginia gubernatorial candidate Ed Gillespie attempting to run down minority children with a vehicle. Gillespie’s campaign decried the ad as ‘disgusting’ and an ‘attack on the people of Virginia,’ prompting the group to pull it – but without any apology.” Media Analyses: Bloomberg Exit Likely Presages Bid By Wall Street-Favored Biden. In an “exclusive,” Fox Business <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=00b-d46&t=c> (3/6, Gasparino, Moynihan) reported that with ex-New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg (D) having announced that he won’t run for president next year, former Vice President Joe Biden “is moving ever closer to another” White House bid, “alerting his network of Wall Street supporters that he is all but certain to announce his candidacy in the next month.” Fox Business said that Bloomberg’s “decision not to run is a sign that” he “is ceding the moderate wing of the Democratic Party to Biden,” according to “people with direct knowledge of the matter.” The article added that “several Wall Street executives who are close to” Biden “say in private he has indicated that barring some last-minute change, he is planning to announce his 2020 presidential intentions soon. Biden is indicating to Democratic Party insiders he will make some announcement by April, these people say.” Under the heading “With Bloomberg Out, Wall Street Desperately Turns To Biden,” Tina Nguyen writes at Vanity Fair <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=00c-ff6&t=c> (3/6) that the Fox Business article on Biden “mirrors what my colleague William D. Cohan reported last week: with Michael Bloomberg out of the way, Wall Street executives close to Biden say, the centrist-friendly lane is wide open. And there’s nobody who better scratches the establishmentarian sweet spot between Full Socialism and Donald J. Trump.” Ben White wrote for Politico Morning Money <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=00d-828&t=c> (3/6), “Among the Wall Street crowd, Bloomberg getting out quickly rockets...Biden to the top of the wish list. He’s more moderate than the rest of the field and less likely to strongly back breaking up the banks and a financial transaction tax. The Wall Street list is roughly: Biden followed by Sens. Corey Booker and Kamala Harris. One top Wall Street Dem emails re this list: ‘That’s about right but deep gap between Biden and the second tier. At the moment. Have been surprised at how many people, when pushed, are pro Biden.’” AFP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=00e-b26&t=c> (3/6, Mathes) reports that political observers are “impatient to know whether the popular” Biden “will actually join the rough-and-tumble 2020 race to challenge Donald Trump.” Biden “has watched from the sidelines as more than a dozen other Democrats, mainly from the party’s ascendant progressive wing” entered “the race. That could leave a lane relatively wide open for a pragmatic centrist like Biden, especially” in the wake of Bloomberg’s decision not to run. AFP says that Biden is “the most prominent American still mulling a presidential campaign, and he would be a clear frontrunner in a crowded field.” *Schoen: Bloomberg Not Likely To Endorse A 2020 Contender “Anytime Soon.” *Mediaite <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=00f-911&t=c> (3/6, Seleh) reported, “Bloomberg advisor and Fox News analyst Doug Schoen says...Bloomberg will not endorse...Biden for the 2020 presidential election and will instead focus on the issues he cares about.” Appearing Wednesday on Fox Business Network, Schoen “said Bloomberg may potentially support a 2020 presidential candidate ‘down the road.’ Asked whether he thinks Bloomberg will support Biden for the 2020 election, Schoen said no. ‘I think reading the statement, having spoken to him at this point, he really is going to do what he said,’ said Schoen,” adding, “He said his focus was on issues. He is going to stick with that and I have no sense that he’s going to make an endorsement anytime soon.” Firefighters Union Chief Schaitberger Wants Biden To Run. The Huffington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=010-f99&t=c> (3/6, Jamieson) reported that if former Vice President Joe Biden enters the 2020 race for president, “he can expect to have a lot of firefighters in his corner. The politically powerful International Association of Fire Fighters has a long and warm relationship with” Biden, dating “back to his early days in the Senate in the 1970s. Even though the 2020 Democratic field is only just taking shape, the head of the firefighters union is making his personal allegiances clear. ‘Oh, I’m more than hoping – I’m doing everything I can to ‘Run, Joe, Run,’’ said Harold Schaitberger, the union’s general president since 2000.” HuffPost added that “it’s likely that the IAFF, which represents 316,000 workers, will be all-in this year if Biden” runs. Biden “is slated to deliver the keynote address at the union’s conference in Washington next week.” Opinion Pieces Focus On Possible Biden Run. In an op-ed for the Washington Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=011-1c1&t=c> (3/6), GOP consultant Matt Mackowiak offers brief observations on the field of announced and potential 2020 Democratic presidential contenders. Of former Vice President Joe Biden, Mackowiak says that he “would be a formidable candidate. He could test President Trump’s path to 270 electoral votes through states such as Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan.” Biden would begin “with strong name identification and an early lead in polling,” but would “be made to answer for his past support of a Clinton-era crime bill and his handling of the Anita Hill hearings. He is known to be gaffe-prone, and his age, gender and race all will be real disadvantages in a party focused on diversity.” In an online op-ed for WSBT-TV <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=012-d4a&t=c> South Bend, IN (3/6), a member of the Sinclair Broadcast Group, political commentator Ameshia Cross said that Biden seems to be “getting closer to making an announcement. He is a beloved leader of the party with a potentially robust fundraising apparatus at his fingertips. His entry into the race will definitely force several in this already crowded field to bow out. However, we’ll see many Democrats attempt to pull him further to the left than he is typically comfortable.” GOP Strategist: Democratic Party “Has Moved On” From Biden. In an op-ed on the website of Fox News <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=013-68c&t=c> (3/6), GOP strategist Colin Reed said that the criticism former Vice President Joe Biden faced for calling Vice President Mike Pence a “decent guy” and for praising Rep. Fred Upton (R-MI), “who at the time was locked in a competitive race Democrats badly wanted to win,” underscores “just how far the political landscape has shifted under Biden’s feet.” Reed said, “His outdated political philosophy is not Biden’s only weakness. He’s a white male” and “a relic of the past in a party seeking a fresh face. He has built a career taking care of the financial services industry that operates in his home state of Delaware. He has poured cold water on socialism.” Reed added that Biden’s “party has moved on and his moment has passed.” HuffPost Analysis: Biden Calls Himself “Middle-Class Joe,” But Few Others Do. The Huffington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=014-749&t=c> (3/6, Delaney) reported that former Vice President Joe Biden “likes to say that other people call him ‘Middle-Class Joe,’ but there is little evidence that anyone calls him that other than Joe Biden himself. ‘I know I’m called Middle-Class Joe,’ Biden said at a campaign event in October. ‘It’s not meant to be a compliment. It means I’m not sophisticated. But I know what made this country what it is: ordinary people doing extraordinary things.’” Biden “has been saying some variation of this line for years.” However, “a search of news archives turns up few instances of anyone other than Biden using the moniker. (His own usage dates to at least 2009.) As for people using it derisively, a lot of journalists have put the phrase in quotation marks and noted that Biden uses the term to describe himself.” Writer: Biden’s “Decent Guy” Remark On Pence Shows He’s “Out Of Touch.” In a piece for the Advocate <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=015-a53&t=c> (3/7), writer and comedian Amanda Kerri takes issue with what she describes as Biden’s “most recent ‘gaffe’ of calling Vice President Mike Pence ‘a decent guy,’” saying that “of course people jumped all over Biden, and deservedly so. People immediately pegged the ‘decent guy’ comment to Pence’s history of anti-LGBTQ positions and beliefs.” Kerri says, “Biden, God bless his decent heart, is a pretty okay guy,” but he “just isn’t the guy for 2020. Biden is a late 20th-century Democrat.” His remark on Pence is “an understandable attitude for politics in 1989 – not 2019. Those days are gone, and describing someone like Pence as ‘decent’ in our current political climate is just out of touch.” *Critics Question Whether Pence Is “Decent,” Citing LGBTQ Views. *USA Today <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=016-dd5&t=c> (3/7, Groppe) reports that Pence’s “defining characteristic – of being nice – is under attack” after liberal criticism forced Biden to backtrack after having called Pence a “decent guy.” Pence’s public persona is that of a “cordial conservative,” and his prior roles as a talk-show host, congressmen, and governor all support this conclusion. However, according to USA Today, the LGBTQ community believes that Pence is opposed to them because of his faith. The perception is fueling a new attack on Pence’s character, and Democratic politicians are quickly revising their opinions, according to the article. *Bullock Hesitates To Call Pence A “Decent Guy.” *Townhall <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=017-430&t=c> (3/6, Veenstra) reports that Gov. Steve Bullock (D-MT), mulling a presidential bid, on Tuesday “struggled to give a straight answer about...Pence” while visiting Iowa. Bullock’s hesitance to give a firm answer about whether Pence is a “decent guy” clashed with a recent compliment he paid the Vice President. He previously said of Pence, “Together, we can certainly jump-start the wheels of cooperative governing again.” *Freeman: 2020 Candidates Must Abandon Revenge Politics Perspective. *In a Wall Street Journal <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=018-7d5&t=c> (3/6, Freeman) column, James Freeman condemns the 2020 Democratic presidential candidates and their base voters’ attitude that political adversaries can no longer be treated with civility. Freeman highlights the recent furor over Biden’s compliment of Pence, and Bullock’s hesitance to commend the Vice President. Freeman calls on Democratic politicians to act civilly even though primary voters may dislike it. Breitbart: CNN Panel Of “Democratic Voters” Included Ex-Congressional Candidate, Activists. Breitbart <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=019-000&t=c> (3/6, Caruso) reported, “CNN aired two panels this week, purporting to show the thoughts of ‘Democratic voters’ throughout the” US, but “a Breitbart News investigation indicates that three of the panel members also have a past of political activism far beyond your average voter. In on air segments that made the rounds online this week, the panel, introduced alternatively as ‘Hillary Clinton voters’ or as ‘Democratic voters,’ expressed their opinions about the current state of the Democratic Party.” In one segment, the panel “flatly rejected Joe Biden as a 2020 candidate.” Breitbart said that panelist Michael Milisits “ran for Congress in the Democratic primary in Ohio as a strong Bernie Sanders supporter.” And “two other panel members, Mary Reaman and Christian Tamte, are also political activists. Both worked as organizers for the 2017 Women’s March in Washington, DC.” Wilmington News Journal Highlights Biden’s Stances On Key Issues. The Wilmington (DE) News Journal <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=01a-1d0&t=c> (3/6, Albright) runs a piece highlighting former Vice President Joe Biden’s stances on a variety of topics, including climate change, “free higher education,” healthcare, and the minimum wage, among other things. Democrats Prioritize “Electability,” But Not Necessarily Moderation, In Picking A Nominee. BuzzFeed News <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=01b-fb0&t=c> (3/6, Hensley-Clancy) reported that ahead of President Trump’s 2020 bid for reelection, “polls show many Democratic voters are prioritizing one thing: electability. In some circles, the word ‘electable’ has become a proxy for moderate – a political centrist whose policies appeal to swing voters in states Trump won in 2016.” However, “the vast majority of Democratic voters aren’t thinking about electability in terms of ideology, geography, or electoral margin, according to interviews with more than 50 Democratic voters in early primary states. Far from tying electability to centrism or moderation, voters said they cared about rhetoric, personality, energy, and momentum when deciding if a candidate could win.” Only “two said they were looking for a political moderate.” In New Hampshire, Some 2016 Supporters Of Sanders Slow To Embrace His 2020 Run. The AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=01c-b65&t=c> (3/7, Woodall) reports that in 2016, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) scored “a 22-point victory” over Hillary Clinton in New Hampshire’s Democratic presidential primary. However, with Sanders mounting a 2020 bid for president, “there are early signs that he doesn’t have a lock on the nation’s first primary. More than a half-dozen Democratic leaders, activists and lawmakers who endorsed” Sanders “in 2016 said they were hesitant to do so again. Some said they were passing over” Sanders “in search of fresh energy while others said...it’s simply too early to make a choice. That caution underscores one of the central challenges facing Sanders.” Unlike in 2016, when “the sole alternative to” Sanders was “the more establishment-oriented...Clinton,” the “2020 field...already spans a dozen candidates and includes several progressives, women and people of color.” WPost A1: Harris’ Term As San Francisco DA Was Marred By Crime Lab Scandal. On its front page, the Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=01d-117&t=c> (3/6, A1, Kranish) reports that when Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) – then the San Francisco district attorney – was mounting a bid to become California attorney general, a scandal over unreliable evidence from a police crime lab “stunned her office and threatened to upend her campaign.” Superior Court Judge Anne-Christine Massullo wrote in a May 2010 decision concerning the scandal that Harris “failed to disclose information that clearly should have been disclosed.” The Post says the “episode, which undercut Harris’s image as a polished leader and raised questions about her management style, has taken on new relevance as the senator seeks the Democratic nomination for the presidency.” Hickenlooper’s Campaign Says He Raised Over $1M In Less Than 48 Hours. The Denver Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=01e-45c&t=c> (3/6, Garcia) reports that ex-Gov. John Hickenlooper (D-CO) “raised more than $1 million for his presidential campaign in less than 48 hours, his campaign” announced on Wednesday, “putting him on pace with several of his Democratic primary opponents.” Hickenlooper kicked off his bid “for the White House on Monday. ... Of the 14 candidates in the race, Hickenlooper is the fifth to reportedly raise more than $1 million in such a short period of time.” DNC Will Exclude Fox From Televising 2020 Primary Debates. The Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=01f-4a6&t=c> (3/6, Farhi) reports the DNC “has decided to exclude Fox News Channel from televising any of its candidate debates during the 2019-2020 cycle as a result of published revelations detailing the cable network’s close ties to the Trump administration.” DNC Chairman Tom Perez “cited a story <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=020-d31&t=c> in the New Yorker magazine this week that detailed how Fox has promoted President Trump’s agenda.” The AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=021-633&t=c> (3/6, Bauder) reports, “Even before that story, some Democratic activists were complaining about the committee’s consideration of Fox as a potential broadcast partner.” The New York Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=022-e87&t=c> (3/6, Grynbaum, Herndon) reports Perez said in the statement that Fox News “is not in a position to host a fair and neutral debate for our candidates.” According to Reuters <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=023-29a&t=c> (3/6), “Representatives for Fox said they hoped the DNC would reconsider and let some of its journalists moderate a Democratic presidential debate.” The Hill <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=024-d87&t=c> (3/6, Daugherty) reported that in a Wednesday tweet, Fox News host Bret Baier said of the DNC decision, “That’s really a shame. When it comes to fairness – our news product speaks for itself. We will continue to cover this 2020 race fairly & will continue to invite Democrats- Republicans & Independents on to talk about key issues & substance with our very large viewing audience.” USA Today <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=025-be2&t=c> (3/6, Hayes) reports that Trump “fired back” at the DNC in a tweet <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=026-2ef&t=c> Wednesday, “suggest[ing] that in return he might halt other networks that have drawn his ire from hosting his debates.” Trump wrote, “Democrats just blocked @FoxNews from holding a debate. Good, then I think I’ll do the same thing with the Fake News Networks and the Radical Left Democrats in the General Election debates!” The Washington Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=027-f95&t=c> (3/6, Morton) says Trump “specified no networks, but he routinely denounces CNN, MSNBC and such print outlets as the Washington Post and the New York Times as ‘Fake News.’” Politico <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=028-e29&t=c> (3/6, Morin) reported, “Fox News did not host a Democratic primary debate during the 2016 or 2008 election cycles. The network, however, did host a town hall in Michigan between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders during the 2016 election.” The Huffington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=029-c09&t=c> (3/6, Blumberg) reported, “In being excluded from hosting the DNC’s debates, Fox could lose out on a major ratings opportunity. The first Democratic debate in October 2015 reached nearly 16 million viewers.” Reuters <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=02a-bad&t=c> (3/6, Oliphant, Dang, Lambert) and the Wall Street Journal <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=02b-60e&t=c> (3/6, Thomas) also report on the story. *Underdogs Williamson, Yang May Qualify For First Democratic Primary Debate. *Politico <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=02c-142&t=c> (3/6, Schneider) reported, “Under newly crafted rules” from the DNC, “two little-known” White House hopefuls “with no governmental experience are poised to qualify for the first [Democratic presidential] debate later this year.” Politico said that spiritualist Marianne Williamson and entrepreneur Andrew Yang “both say they are on track to meet the grassroots donation threshold set by the DNC to get into the first debate in June.” Politico added, “To qualify, candidates must get at least 1 percent support in three party-approved public polls – or receive campaign donations from 65,000 individuals with a minimum of 200 donors apiece in 20 states, the DNC said in February.” The Daily Beast <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=02d-009&t=c> (3/6, Stein) reported that Yang “has somehow managed to get more than 47,000 individual donors to his campaign as of Wednesday night.” Should that figure increase “to 65,000 over the next two months, he will qualify to participate in the first primary debate. He’s already met one threshold – that his campaign have a minimum of 200 donors per state in at least 20 states. And his team says he’s a lock to clear the other. ‘100 percent. Hell will have to freeze over at this rate for us not to,’ said Zach Graumann, Yang’s campaign manager.” Leading the News Trump Urges GOP To “Stay United” On Border Policy As Senate Vote Nears. As President Trump and the White House continued efforts to keep Republican senators from signing on to an effort to express disapproval of the President’s declaration of a national emergency at the US-Mexico border, DHS Secretary Nielsen was on Capitol Hill defending the Administration’s border policy. Coverage focuses on the harsh Democratic questioning of Nielsen, particularly over the treatment of child migrants and on family separation. The President tweeted <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=02e-71a&t=c> at 12:54 p.m., “Senate Republicans are not voting on constitutionality or precedent, they are voting on desperately needed Border Security & the Wall. Our Country is being invaded with Drugs, Human Traffickers, & Criminals of all shapes and sizes. That’s what this vote is all about. STAY UNITED!” At 7:02 p.m., he tweeted <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=02f-d36&t=c>, “Wall Street Journal: ‘More migrant families crossing into the U.S. illegally have been arrested in the first five months of the federal fiscal year than in any prior full year.’ We are doing a great job at the border, but this is a National Emergency!” White House correspondent John Roberts said on Fox News Special Report[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=030-870&t=c> (3/6), “If a vote were held today the President would likely lose. Four Republicans” – Sens. Susan Collins (R-ME), Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), Rand Paul (R-KY), and Thom Tills (R-NC) – “have said will vote to block the emergency. Another four” – Sens. Lamar Alexander (R-TN), Cory Gardner (R-CO), Mike Lee (R-UT), and Mitt Romney (R-UT) – “might join with them. Rand Paul says they could ultimately get 10 or more.” But on Fox News’ Hannity[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=031-a33&t=c> (3/6), Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) said, “We need to change our laws and we need to build a wall. Trump is going to win in Congress on the wall.” The Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=032-372&t=c> (3/6, Wagner) reports White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders “lashed out Wednesday at Republican senators considering bucking President Trump on his national emergency declaration, saying their inaction on border security has forced Trump ‘to fix this problem on his own.’” Appearing on Fox News’ Fox & Friends[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=033-9f8&t=c> (3/6), Sanders said, “Democrats are still refusing to acknowledge the crisis on the border, particularly when Barack Obama himself even called it a ‘crisis’ in 2014. We know exactly what it is. It is time they start doing their jobs and actually fixing it. ... If Congress didn’t want him to declare a national emergency, they should have done their jobs and actually fixed the problem, instead of just denying that it exists.” Politico <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=034-81b&t=c> (3/6, Everett) reports, “As the first vote approaches, there are signs the president is becoming increasingly interested in the final tally, though he still faces an uphill battle to fend off a bipartisan rebuke.” While a Trump veto is unlikely to be overridden, “under the National Emergencies Act, Republicans believe Democrats will be able to bring up a disapproval vote on Trump’s move to declare an emergency and seize billions from military construction every six months. ... That would essentially force Trump loyalty tests every six months unless the president withdraws” the declaration. Mara Liasson of NPR said on Fox News Special Report[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=035-625&t=c> (3/6), “We are not sitting here in Washington having a debate over whether to call it a ‘crisis’ or to call it an ‘emergency.’ The debate is about whether the President should be allowed to declare a national emergency – a term of law – so that he can build a wall. ... Congress had a big debate and passed a funding bill that included a lot of things,” but “they didn’t give the President one thing that he really wanted, which is money for a wall.” *Nielsen Defends Border Policy Before House Homeland Security Committee. *ABC World News Tonight[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=036-08f&t=c> (3/6, story 8, 0:50, Muir) reported Nielsen “was on Capitol Hill today, testifying for the first time since President Trump declared a national emergency at the southern border. Government figures, in fact, show more than 66,000 migrants crossed the border without authorization last month. That is the highest number in 11 years. Nielsen was questioned about the Administration’s family separation policy. She insisted, though, children are not still being kept in cages.” House Homeland Security Chairman Bennie Thompson: “Are we putting children in cages, as of today?” Nielsen: “Children are processed at the border facility stations that you’ve been at, some of them --” Thompson: “And I’ve seen the cages. I just want you to admit that the cages exist.” Nielsen: “Sir, they’re not cages.” Several House Democrats criticized that response on Twitter. Rep. Salud Carbajal (D-CA) tweeted <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=037-f12&t=c>, “More than 2,700 children were separated from their parents & detained by CBP last year. They were kept in chain-link cages. Some were sexually assaulted. Three children died in custody. Given these facts, & @DHSgov Secretary Nielsen’s lies under oath today, she should resign.” Rep. Mark DeSaulnier (D-CA) tweeted <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=038-b89&t=c>, “I have been to the border, met families who were torn apart, and seen first-hand the cages that the Trump Administration has locked children in. Secretary Nielsen’s testimony today is just wrong – I witnessed it with my own eyes.” Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney (D-NY) tweeted <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=039-f64&t=c>, “We all know what a cage looks like. Come on.” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) tweeted <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=03a-f8b&t=c>, “Sec. Nielsen, whether you call it a ‘cage’ or a ‘detention space,’ it doesn’t change the fact that your policy is ‘inhumane’ and ‘doesn’t reflect American values.’” The AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=03b-9bd&t=c> (3/6, Long) reports Nielsen “insisted Wednesday the crisis at the southern border is not manufactured.” Nielsen said, “We face a crisis – a real, serious and sustained crisis at our borders. Make no mistake: This chain of human misery is getting worse.” Thompson said he wanted to use the hearing “in part to give Nielsen the opportunity to start a ‘serious discussion,’ rather than echoing [Trump’s] claims of a security crisis at the border.” Thompson said, “No amount of verbal gymnastics will change that she knew the Trump administration was implementing a policy to separate families at the border.” USA Today <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=03c-e92&t=c> (3/6, Gomez, Shesgreen, Borowski) reports Democrats also “hammered” Nielsen over the President’s “attempts to unilaterally expand the southern border wall and the administration’s ‘zero tolerance’ policy that led to thousands of migrant families being separated.” Nielsen “said the policy was not a ‘family separation’ one but did mandate criminal prosecutions against all migrants, including those crossing the border with children.” Rep. Kathleen Rice (D-NY) responded, “You knew that that policy was going to result in children having to be taken away from their parents. That’s a policy. You should admit it.” Rice later said on CNN’s Anderson Cooper 360[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=03d-38e&t=c> (3/6), “She was aware of the policy before he announced it. She knew it was coming. She knew it was going to result in children being ripped away from their parents. ... She was under oath today, and I think it’s very disturbing that someone in her position can come before a congressional committee and blatantly give false testimony.” Reuters <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=03e-7bb&t=c> (3/6, Torbati, Rosenberg) reports Rep. Nanette Barragán (D-CA) “challenged Nielsen over claims that the government is not turning away people seeking asylum at official ports of entry, stating that she herself on Saturday witnessed a Honduran asylum seeker being turned away by a border agent.” Barragán said, “Madam Secretary, I don’t know if you know what’s happening, or if this is happening without you knowing, but it’s totally unacceptable.” The Washington Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=03f-680&t=c> (3/6, A1, Dinan) reports Democrats “also accused Ms. Nielsen of being unprepared, questioning why she had ready answers for GOP lawmakers’ questions but was unable to answer their own inquiries on topics such as how many vacancies there are at CBP, how many juvenile illegal immigrants have gang ties or how often environmental laws have been waived to build border fencing.” The New York Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=040-b34&t=c> (3/6, Kanno-Youngs, Shear) reports the hearing was Nielsen’s “first since Democrats took control of the House this year.” USA Today <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=041-373&t=c> (3/6, Cummings) reports during the hearing, Rep. Clay Higgins (R-LA) “compared the arrival of migrants at the U.S. southern border to the number of U.S. troops who invaded Europe on D-Day in World War II.” He said, “Perhaps the most famous invasion in the history of the world – D-Day – 73,000 American troops landed in the D-Day invasion. We have 76,103, according to my numbers, apprehensions along our southern border last month. We have D-Day every month on our southern border, just to put this in context for America.” Following the hearing, Nielsen tweeted <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=042-015&t=c>, “The truth is that the politics and policies of open borders have failed the American people. Our broken system endures, and the ongoing humanitarian and security crisis at our Southwest Border leaves many minors and families at extreme risk of being exploited by traffickers, human smugglers, gangs, and other nefarious actors seeking to profit at their expense.” Bloomberg <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=043-9c3&t=c> (3/6, Flatley) and Politico <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=044-9a0&t=c> (3/6, Hesson) are among the other outlets covering Nielsen’s appearance. *McAleenan: Arrests Of Migrant Families At Border Surging. *The Wall Street Journal <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=045-88c&t=c> (3/6, Radnofsky, Jamerson) reports CBP Commissioner Kevin McAleenan told the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday that arrests of Central American migrant families crossing the border in the past five months exceeded the total for the entire previous fiscal year. The Washington Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=046-b88&t=c> (3/6, Dinan) reports McAleenan also told the committee that “as smuggling prices rise, the cartels that control the migrant traffic through Mexico stand to make as much as $2.5 billion this year.” McAleenan said, “They’re profiting tremendously.” *Border Agents Told To Target Spanish Speakers, Latin American Migrants For Asylum Program. *The AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=047-3b6&t=c> (3/7, Spagat) reports, “Border agents have been told to explicitly target Spanish speakers and migrants from Latin America in carrying out a Trump administration program requiring asylum seekers wait in Mexico, according to memos obtained” by the AP. The guidance “includes instruction about various groups of immigrants who are not to be sent back to Mexico and instead go through the traditional asylum process in the U.S. immigration court system.” *Government Kept Database On Journalists And Activists Investigating Caravan. *The AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=048-ed1&t=c> (3/7) reports KNSD-TV San Diego reported Wednesday that the federal government “ran an operation to screen journalists, activists and others while investigating last year’s migrant caravan from Mexico.” Leaked documents show that “dossiers that included photos from their passports or social media accounts, date of birth and other details were kept in a database and some freelance journalists had alerts placed on their passports and were flagged for secondary screenings at customs points.” Townhall <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=049-db3&t=c> (3/6, Baumann) covered the KNSD-TV report under the headline “Trump Team Established Database With This Information Regarding The Caravans.” *Trump Meets With Kinzinger, Who Deployed To Border Last Month. *The AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=04a-862&t=c> (3/7, Colvin, Richmond) reports Trump met Wednesday with Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-IL), “who was deployed last month to the U.S.-Mexico border with his Air National Guard unit.” Kinzinger told reporters at the White House, “I went down to the border keeping an open mind on the issue of whether this is an emergency or not. And I’ll tell you: I came back absolutely convinced this is a national emergency.” The AP says Kinzinger “has been a sharp critic of Trump at times, denouncing him in appearances on CNN.” *WPost Analysis: Trump “Losing Ground On Top Priorities.” *The Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=04b-b3f&t=c> (3/6, Nakamura, Kim, Dawsey) writes in an analysis that the President and his Administration have “been on a pronounced losing streak over the past week. Trump is losing ground on top priorities to curb illegal immigration, cut the trade deficit and blunt North Korea’s nuclear threat – setbacks that complicate his planned reelection message as a can-do president who is making historic progress.” On Tuesday, DHS “announced that unauthorized border crossings have spiked to the highest pace in 12 years – despite Trump’s hard-line rhetoric and new policies aimed at deterring migrants.” Foreign Policy Trump “Very Disappointed” If North Korea Is Rebuilding Missile Site. The CBS Evening News[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=04c-ea4&t=c> (3/6, story 3, 0:15, Glor) reported President Trump said Wednesday that “he’d be ‘very disappointed’ if reports were true that North Korea is restoring a long-range rocket site that it disabled last year.” NBC Nightly News[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=04d-7c7&t=c> (3/6, story 3, 0:50, Holt) showed Trump saying, “I would be very disappointed if that were happening. I would be very, very disappointed in Chairman Kim. And I don’t think I will be, but we’ll see what happens.” However, Andrea Mitchell reported National Security Adviser Bolton “is taking a much harder line, warning that if Kim does not dismantle his weapons as promised, the US might ramp up sanctions on the regime.” ABC World News Tonight[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=04e-2ed&t=c> (3/6, story 7, 1:55, Muir) reported Trump “insisted he had a good relationship with Kim Jong-un and is still hoping negotiations will continue.” Reuters <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=04f-7cc&t=c> (3/6, Mason, Brunnstrom) and the AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=050-8e5&t=c> (3/6, Riechmann, Lee) similarly report Trump’s comments, as does Bloomberg <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=051-499&t=c> (3/7, Jacobs, Pettypiece), which reports the Center for Strategic and International Studies said satellite images “showed that North Korea was rebuilding a long-range rocket site at the Sohae Launch Facility.” Bloomberg notes that the site “was dismantled after Trump’s June summit with Kim in an apparent show of goodwill by Pyongyang.” A Wall Street Journal <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=052-73f&t=c> (3/6) editorial says the newly revealed satellite photos are a sign that President Trump should rethink his cancellation of large military exercises with South Korea. The Journal argues that the exercises serve as a crucial deterrent to North Korea. *South Korean Media: Movement Detected At North Korea ICBM Plant. * Reuters <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=053-131&t=c> (3/7, Mason, Brunnstrom) reports South Korean media said Thursday that “new activities have been detected at a North Korean intercontinental ballistic missiles plant.” Cargo vehicles were spotted moving “recently around a factory at Sanumdong in Pyongyang, which produced North Korea’s first intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs).” *Pyongyang Airs Documentary Praising Kim’s Summit With Trump. *The AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=054-da3&t=c> (3/7, Kim) reports North Korean state TV aired “a documentary glorifying leader Kim Jong Un’s recent visit to Vietnam that omitted the failed nuclear negotiations” with President Trump. The documentary “shows a smiling Kim talking with Trump while walking together inside a Hanoi hotel last week,” and “also shows Kim’s black limousine passing through a Hanoi street lined with residents waving flags.” The documentary “cited Kim as saying North Korea and the U.S. must put an end to their decades-long animosity and confrontation,” but did not mention the lack of an agreement at the summit. *NYTimes Analysis: Kim May Be Forced To Negotiate Due To Impact Of Sanctions. *In an analysis titled “Will Kim Jong-un Return To Brinkmanship? Weak Economy Is Forcing His Hand,” Choe Sang-Hun of the New York Times <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=055-a63&t=c> (3/6) writes that Kim returned from his Hanoi summit with President Trump “empty-handed – without relief from international sanctions – prompting the question of what he will do next: Particularly, will he resume his nuclear and missile brinkmanship to reassert his leverage?” According to Choe, “The revelation...that North Korea had started rebuilding the partly dismantled facilities...where the country tests technologies for its intercontinental ballistic missiles, raised the specter that...Kim was returning to his provocative behavior.” However, Choe says “experts on North Korea,” believe Kim “may be boxed in...amid strong signs that the North Korean economy is continuing to contract.” Choe says those experts contend that “the deepening economic trouble may force the country to return to the negotiating table.” WPost Analysis: National Security Team Struggles To Explain Trump Foreign Policy. In an analysis, the Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=056-c89&t=c> (3/6, Gearan, Costa) writes, “Two years into a presidency that has upended assumptions about the U.S. role in the world and flipped the script on core Republican tenets such as arms control, ardent support for democratic principles and free trade,” President Trump’s “national security officials and Republican allies are still struggling to defend or even explain the president.” The Post says “in many ways, Trump’s worldview has been boiled down to a mantra lacking labels and ideology: It is what Trump says it is. ... But arguing in favor of that singular style has proved easier from outside the administration than within,” and officials like Secretary of State Pompeo and National Security Adviser Bolton have struggled to do so. Pence Announces Additional Visa Revocations Targeting Maduro Allies. The AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=057-70b&t=c> (3/6, Lugo) reports Vice President Pence said Wednesday that the Administration “will revoke more visas from prominent Venezuelans as it seeks to increase pressure on President Nicolas Maduro to give up power.” Pence “told the Latino Coalition that the US will revoke 77 visas held by officials in the Maduro government or their relatives.” The AP notes that the Administration “revoked 49 visas last week and has imposed multiple rounds of sanctions as part of a campaign to force Maduro to turn over power” to interim President Juan Guaidó. Reuters <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=058-5a3&t=c> (3/6, Heavey) reports that also yesterday, National Security Adviser Bolton “warned foreign banks and other financial institutions that they will face U.S. sanctions for ‘illegitimate’ transactions that benefit...Maduro and his network.” Said Bolton, “The United States is putting foreign financial institutions on notice that they will face sanctions for being involved in facilitating illegitimate transactions that benefit Nicolas Maduro and his corrupt network.” *Exiled Venezuelan Soldiers Planned To Accompany Aid From Colombia. *Bloomberg <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=059-f74&t=c> (3/6, Bronner, Wainer) reports that “late last month, as US officials joined...Guaido near a bridge in Colombia to send desperately needed aid to the masses...some 200 exiled soldiers were...planning to clear the way for the convoy.” According to Bloomberg, “Led by retired General Cliver Alcala, who has been living in Colombia, they were going to drive back the Venezuelan national guardsmen blocking the aid on the other side.” However, “The plan was stopped by the Colombian government, which learned of it late and feared violent clashes at a highly public event it promised would be peaceful.” *Venezuela Detains, Deports US Journalist. *The Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=05a-70f&t=c> (3/6, Krygier) reports Venezuela “detained a US freelance journalist in Caracas for several hours Wednesday as President Nicolás Maduro sought to maintain control amid a Western-backed opposition campaign to unseat him.” Military counterintelligence forces raided the home of US freelance journalist Cody Weddle and took him into custody. Weddle was deported Wednesday evening. *German Ambassador To Venezuela Expelled. *Reuters <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=05b-e22&t=c> (3/6, Sequera, Berwick) reports German Ambassador Daniel Kriener was expelled Wednesday “two days after he and diplomats from other embassies welcomed home...Guaido at the Caracas airport.” According to Reuters, the Maduro regime “declared Kriener persona non grata and gave him 48 hours to leave the country, accusing him of meddling in internal affairs, although it did not give specific details.” Report: “Hundreds” Of ISIS Fighters Surrender, “Hundreds” More Captured Trying To Flee. Reuters <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=05c-c56&t=c> (3/6, Francis, Said) reports that “hundreds” of ISIS fighters surrendered Wednesday, while “hundreds more of their comrades were caught trying to escape the jihadist group’s last, tiny scrap of land in eastern Syria.” ISIS fighters “holed up in the enclave at Baghouz near the Iraqi border have been giving up in large numbers this week after a ferocious assault on their enclave on Saturday and Sunday, but many remain inside.” Reuters says “the US-backed Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) militia has slowed its attack to allow thousands of civilians to leave Baghouz.” The AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=05d-930&t=c> (3/6, El Deeb) reports that “angry crowds evacuating from the last shred of territory held by Islamic State militants in Syria praised the extremist group Wednesday and chanted ‘Islamic State will remain,’ in a menacing show of support, even as defeat loomed.” Nevertheless, according to the AP, “the latest wave of evacuations brings the IS a step closer to defeat by the Kurdish-led SDF.” *Yazidi Boys Held Captive As ISIS Slaves Freed. *Richard Engel reported on NBC Nightly News[image: Image removed by sender. Video] <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=05e-102&t=c> (3/6, story 7, 1:35, Holt) that “when hundreds of ISIS fighters surrendered today...it meant that some of their youngest victims were finally free.” Engel highlighted the plight of Yazidi boys who were “kidnapped by ISIS and held as slaves.” Seven-year-old Farhat said, “They took me and my brother from our house in a car. Our parents went in a truck.” Engel added, “That was five years ago, the last time he saw his mom and dad.” *Iraq Accused Of Torturing Minors Suspected Of Fighting For ISIS. *The Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=05f-a9b&t=c> (3/6, El-Ghobashy) reports Human Rights Watch claims Iraq is “holding at least 1,500 children suspected of being members of the Islamic State and are using torture to extract confessions that lead to wrongful convictions.” Human Rights Watch “said the practices are not just a violation of due process, but also probably constitute a breach of international law calling for former child recruits of extremist groups to be rehabilitated and reintegrated into society.” The report from HRW “raises new questions about Iraq’s ability to ensure justice in a post-Islamic State landscape that has been marked by mass death sentences of Sunnis accused of ties to the terrorist group and the quarantine of families in decrepit camps...on suspicion of being affiliated with” ISIS. The AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=060-44e&t=c> (3/6, Karam) reports that a spokesman for Iraq’s Ministry of Interior “denied the HRW accusations, saying authorities in Baghdad are holding around 500 IS women, and some of those have their children with them.” The spokesman “said the children are not being investigated and are being provided with medicine, food and clothes.” Rouhani: No Chance Of Negotiations With US. The AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=061-52d&t=c> (3/6) reports Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said in a televised speech Wednesday “that there was no chance of negotiations or compromise with the United States, allegedly because Washington is seeking to topple the government in Tehran.” Rouhani said the differences between Iran and the US are so wide, they are “neither negotiable nor can there be a compromise.” *Report: Iranian Hackers Have Hit Hundreds Of Companies In Past Two Years. *The Wall Street Journal <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=062-ad8&t=c> (3/6, McMillan) reports Microsoft said Wednesday that cyberattacks linked to Iranian hackers have targeted more than 200 companies over the past two years in more than a half-dozen countries including Saudi Arabia, Germany, the UK, India and the US. Erdoğan: Turkey Will Not Go Back On Missile Defense Deal With Russia. Reuters <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=063-dce&t=c> (3/6, Gumrukcu) reports Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, in an interview with broadcaster Kanal 24 on Wednesday, said Turkey remains committed to its agreement to buy S-400 missile defense systems from Russia and that backing out of the deal would be “immoral.” Said Erdoğan, “It’s done. There can never be a turning back. This would not be ethical, it would be immoral. Nobody should ask us to lick up what we spat.” Erdoğan “add[ed] that Ankara may subsequently look into buying S-500 systems.” The Administration had previously “told Turkey that if it buys the S-400 systems, the United States will have to reassess Ankara’s participation in the Lockheed Martin F-35 fighter program.” Former Trudeau Aide Defends PM In SNC-Lavalin Scandal. The AP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=064-ff2&t=c> (3/6, Gillies) reports Gerald Butts, a close friend to and former top aide for Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, testified Wednesday “that the demotion of [Canadian Attorney General Jody Wilson-Raybould] had nothing to do with alleged efforts to pressure her into not prosecuting a Canadian company in a corruption case.” While Butts acknowledged government officials had voiced concerns about how the case against SNC-Lavalin could impact jobs, he said, “I firmly believe here that nothing inappropriate occurred here and nothing inappropriate was alleged to have occurred until after the Cabinet shuffle.” Butts added, “When you boil this all down, the only thing we ever asked the attorney general to do was to get a second opinion. And we also made it clear that she was free to accept that opinion, or not.” AFP <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mailview.aspx?m=2019030701biden&r=email-a22c&l=065-d56&t=c> (3/6, Comte) quotes Butts as saying, “If anyone crossed a line, it was the responsibility of the minister to inform somebody about that. And I’m presenting myself as the most likely person that would have been informed, and I was not.” The Washington Post <http://mailview.bulletinintelligence.com/mail
METADATA:
THREAD:
INDEX:
AQGMmWciVd9qIXrjWDjB/0GYXYI/RqaQpaLA
REFERENCES:
REPLY_TO:
<0.0.0.4F.1D4D4E570879615.0@colo033.bulletinnews.com>
REFS:
<0.0.0.4F.1D4D4E570879615.0@colo033.bulletinnews.com>