EMAIL DETAILS

I am not aware of any contacts with Frank’s staff and don’t know the name Kanjorski. Lee Wolosky left a message with Jake Siewart but has not spoken to him and was going to try again tomorrow, particularly if there is a NYT article in the morning


************************************
William A. Isaacson, Esq.
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
5301 Wisconsin Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20015
General Number: 202.237.2727
Direct Number: 202.237.9607
Facsimile: 202.237.6131
Cell: 202.258.1443
www.BSFLLP.com

From: Nicholas Gravante
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 6:53 PM
To: 'hbiden@rosemontseneca.com'
Cc: William Isaacson
Subject: Re: Washinton Mutual Issue

I need to bounce the question re David's schedule to my partner Bill Isaacson. We have not met with Kanjorski. I am not sure that we have contacted Treasury yet.

________________________________
From: Hunter Biden <hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>
To: Nicholas Gravante
Sent: Thu Mar 04 18:05:39 2010
Subject: RE: Washinton Mutual Issue
I have requests out for meetings with Frank staff (have you guys met w/ Kanjorski?) and at Treasury (have you had any contact there?). What are times on Monday that David would be available for meetings if that is possible.

R. Hunter Biden
Rosemont Seneca Partners, LLC
1010 Wisconsin Av., NW
Suite 705
Washington, DC 20007
202-333-1880
P Consider the environment before printing this email.
This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential and intended solely for the addressees. Any unauthorized use or dissemination is prohibited.

From: Nicholas Gravante [mailto:NGravante@BSFLLP.com<mailto:NGravante@BSFLLP.com>]
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 11:22 AM
To: hbiden@rosemontseneca.com<mailto:hbiden@rosemontseneca.com>
Cc: Michael Endler
Subject: FW: Washinton Mutual Issue


Hunter,

The email below is the general introduction email we have used when contacting folks an Capitol Hill. Please let me know if you need anything else.

Thanks,
Nick


Here is text for an all purposes email

You may remember that in September of 2008, JP Morgan bought most of the assets of Washington Mutual Bank for $1.88 billion from the FDIC. This transaction occurred on the same day WaMu was closed and the FDIC was appointed WaMu’s receiver. JPM has reported that it has made billions from its 2008 purchase of WaMu from the FDIC. JPMC a TARP recipient, is now claiming an additional $2.6 billion in WaMu tax refunds from the November 2009 stimulus package. Congress expressly carved out TARP recipients—such as JPM—from those who could benefit from the November 2009 stimulus package. JPM argues nonetheless that there is a loophole in the law: Washington Mutual Bank, not JPMC, may claim the stimulus tax relief and then turn it over to JPM. JPM is now trying to obtain the FDIC’s consent to a settlement of claims that awards the $2.6 billion in stimulus refunds to a TARP recipient (JPM) and the FDIC is urging a settlement that will permit that result.


________________________________
IRS Circular 230 disclosure:
To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, unless we expressly state otherwise, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
________________________________
The information contained in this electronic message is confidential information intended only for the use of the named recipient(s) and may contain information that, among other protections, is the subject of attorney-client privilege, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this electronic message is not the named recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the named recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and no privilege is waived. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this electronic message and then deleting this electronic message from your computer. [v.1]

________________________________
The information contained in this electronic message is confidential information intended only for the use of the named recipient(s) and may contain information that, among other protections, is the subject of attorney-client privilege, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this electronic message is not the named recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the named recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and no privilege is waived. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this electronic message and then deleting this electronic message from your computer. [v.1]